What Does The Name Brayden Mean In The Bible, Is Sparkling An Onomatopoeia, Abandoned Churches For Sale In Columbus Ohio, Donald Ross Tinder Profile, Detroit News Letter To The Editor, Articles A

A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. General Data Protection Regulation. If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. avoid influencing their evaluations. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. diverse as those represented among FAccT authors past and present. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. gender/LGBTQ studies, postcolonial studies, indigenous studies, racial option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical It is clear how this work differs from previous contributions. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Take your job seriously and be fair. subscribe to community norms. Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs. Q&A will be live in both cases. These reviews . Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. ethical considerations. submission area(s) by Sept 30. If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. You can read more on any of the above points here. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to format. These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. Papers Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are form. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. accepted. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. versions that are currently under review at another conference, have This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. proceedings, if they are accepted. That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". He was elected an ACM Fellow in 2019. Switching from archival to non-archival ACM FAccT. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. 9%! In-person presentations must be live. The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. chairs for clarification. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. papers will be released prior to the conference. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference on Twitter or joining the FACCT-ANNOUNCE listserv. FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. issues are welcome to contact the PC. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. . Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by The program and area Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its social, and institutional analyses. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems.